MCP server · trust report

com.scrubmytext/tools

2 checks that ran failed — credential hygiene and transport config — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.

Publisher
com.scrubmytext
Repository
Install
remote only
Versions
4
MCP revision
2025-11-25 · superseded
Inspected
5 of 6 checks · 85%
Scored
2026-09-04 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks2 clean3 flagged1 not inspected
  • Injection surface

    pass25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    Scanned 323 text field(s); no instruction-injection patterns found. PASS = no static red flag. A server can serve different tool descriptions at runtime (the rug-pull class), which static scanning cannot see.

  • Supply chain

    warn25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    no resolvable repository linked to the package (provenance unverifiable)

  • Credential hygiene

    fail15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    tool "verify_signed_signal" has a secret-shaped input parameter "shared_secret" — secrets must never be tool parameters (the model would supply/handle the credential). tool "manage_resource_lease" has a secret-shaped input parameter "lease_token" — secrets must never be tool parameters (the model would supply/handle the credential).

  • Permission scope

    unscannable15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    No source files, package.json, or pyproject were fetched; cannot infer capability scope.

  • Version behavior

    pass10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    vs prior 6.2.1 (major bump): tool "reserve_action_budget" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "record_action_receipt" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "verify_signed_signal" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "manage_resource_lease" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "manage_authority_delegation" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "manage_agent_stop" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "manage_task_handoff" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "manage_action_reconciliation" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "anchor_context_trace" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "manage_task_contract" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); new tool "check_agent_readiness" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_action_quorum" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_task_deadline" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_attention_budget" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_agent_escalation" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_terms_pin" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "match_policy_requirements" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_action_compensation" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_context_status" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_context_rights" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "manage_disclosure_budget" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "list_quality_cards" appeared; new tool "get_quality_card" appeared; new tool "compare_quality_targets" appeared; new tool "record_quality_observation" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "request_quality_correction" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs). Low-severity drift (informational; consistent with the version bump).

  • Transport config

    fail10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    remote MCP endpoint declares NO authentication (unauthenticated remote — nginx-ui/CVE-2026-33032 class)

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v7.5.0 · current2026-08-19 C62.55/6 · 85%±0
v6.2.12026-08-15 C62.54/6 · 75%