dev.workers.kikoribera03.flat-rate-llm/x402-tools

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

• Injection surface

  pass25% of grade

  Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

  Scanned 377 text field(s); no instruction-injection patterns found. PASS = no static red flag. A server can serve different tool descriptions at runtime (the rug-pull class), which static scanning cannot see.

• Supply chain

  warn25% of grade

  Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

  no resolvable repository linked to the package (provenance unverifiable)

• Credential hygiene

  fail15% of grade

  How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

  tool "evm_nft_owner" has a secret-shaped input parameter "tokenId" — secrets must never be tool parameters (the model would supply/handle the credential).

• Permission scope

  unscannable15% of grade

  Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

  No source files, package.json, or pyproject were fetched; cannot infer capability scope.

• Version behavior

  warn10% of grade

  Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

  vs prior 1.0.1 (minor bump): tool "catalog" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); new tool "evm_token_safety" appeared; new tool "content_horror_story" appeared; new tool "content_roast" appeared; new tool "red_email_check" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "red_domain_check" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "web_read" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "util_iban" appeared; new tool "util_vat" appeared; new tool "web_status" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "red_ip" appeared; new tool "red_asn" appeared; new tool "red_dnsbl" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "util_phone" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "fx_convert" appeared; new tool "red_whois" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs).

• Transport config

  fail10% of grade

  Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

  remote MCP endpoint declares NO authentication (unauthenticated remote — nginx-ui/CVE-2026-33032 class)