2 checks that ran failed — supply chain and version behavior — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.
- Publisher
- io.github.AceDataCloud
- Repository
- github.com/AceDataCloud/WanMCP
- Install
- pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan, pypi:mcp-wan
- Versions
- 43
- Inspected
- 5 of 6 checks · 75%
- Scored
- 2026-09-02 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
fail25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
Python build script executes at build time: network call in build script
Credential hygiene
pass15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. core/config.py) — the recommended intake shape. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.
Permission scope
pass15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
Network egress present (core/client.py: outbound HTTP/socket call) — expected for most servers and not a finding on its own. No shell-exec, unbounded/sensitive filesystem, or download-and-run primitives found in scanned source. PASS = no static red flag. Static scanning is blind to code fetched or executed at runtime.
Version behavior
fail10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
vs prior 2026.8.25.0 (patch bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: http-client; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): api.acedata.cloud, api.test.com, auth.acedata.cloud, cdn.acedata.cloud, custom.api.com, example.com, github.com, platform.acedata.cloud, platform.cdn.acedata.cloud.
Transport config
warn10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
manifest/source references tracking behavior — disclosure
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v2026.8.28.0 · current | 2026-08-28 | C | 60 | 5/6 · 75% | B→C in v2026.8.28.0 |
| v2026.8.25.0 | 2026-08-25 | B | 75 | 5/6 · 75% | ±0 |
| v2026.8.24.2 | 2026-08-24 | B | 75 | 5/6 · 75% | ±0 |
| v2026.8.24.1 | 2026-08-24 | B | 75 | 5/6 · 75% | ±0 |
| v2026.8.18.0 | 2026-08-18 | B | 75 | 5/6 · 75% | ±0 |
| v2026.8.17.0 | 2026-08-17 | B | 75 | 4/6 · 65% | C→B in v2026.8.17.0 |
| v2026.8.15.0 | 2026-08-15 | C | 70 | 5/6 · 75% | B→C in v2026.8.15.0 |
| v2026.7.30.0 | 2026-07-30 | B | 95 | 5/6 · 75% | C→B in v2026.7.30.0 |
| v2026.7.12.0 | 2026-07-12 | C | 70 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v2026.7.1.0 | 2026-07-01 | C | 70 | 4/6 · 65% | insf→C in v2026.7.1.0 |
| v2026.5.24.0 | 2026-05-24 | insufficient | — | 1/6 · 25% | C→insf in v2026.5.24.0 |
| v2026.4.30.0 | 2026-04-30 | C | 70 | 4/6 · 65% | — |