1 check that ran failed — permission scope — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.
- Publisher
- io.github.Harusame64
- Repository
- github.com/Harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp
- Install
- npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp, npm:@harusame64/desktop-touch-mcp
- Versions
- 44
- Inspected
- 3 of 6 checks · 55%
- Scored
- 2026-07-21 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
warn25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
install hook "prepare" present and not a recognized benign build command
Credential hygiene
pass15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. bin/launcher.js) — the recommended intake shape. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.
Permission scope
fail15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
HIGH: shell/exec capability AND network egress together — download-and-execute risk (bin/launcher.js: imports child_process and calls exec/spawn; bin/launcher.js: outbound HTTP/socket call). discloses shell/exec capability: bin/launcher.js: imports child_process and calls exec/spawn Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.
Version behavior
unscannable10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
no prior version to diff (first sight of io.github.Harusame64/[email protected]); version-drift / rug-pull cannot be evaluated. Cold-start risk is covered by point-in-time checks (injection_surface, supply_chain, credential_hygiene), not here.
Transport config
unscannable10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
local stdio server: no remote transport or auth surface, and no phone-home/telemetry signal found in source. Absence of transport findings is NOT a safety guarantee — phone-home hosts can be constructed at runtime and defeat static analysis.
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v1.12.3 · current | 2026-07-17 | C | 72.5 | 3/6 · 55% | ±0 |
| v1.9.2 | 2026-05-25 | C | 72.5 | 3/6 · 55% | — |