io.github.Ikalus1988/misakanet

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

• Injection surface

  unscannable25% of grade

  Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

  No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.

• Supply chain

  pass25% of grade

  Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

  Python build script has no build-time network/exec; repository linkage verified

• Credential hygiene

  warn15% of grade

  How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

  tests/test_intake_redaction.py: embeds a PRIVATE KEY block. (in an example/sample file — lower severity, but a real key here still leaks.) tests/test_redaction_sync.py: embeds a PRIVATE KEY block. (in an example/sample file — lower severity, but a real key here still leaks.) Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. misakanet/guard.py) — the recommended intake shape.

• Permission scope

  warn15% of grade

  Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

  has both shell/exec and network egress — capable of download-and-run, though no such path was observed (misakanet/guard.py: subprocess.* call; misakanet/cli/remote.py: outbound HTTP/socket call). has both shell/exec and destructive filesystem writes (misakanet/guard.py: subprocess.* call; misakanet/cli/heal.py: open(…, 'w'/'a'/'x') write-mode file access). discloses shell/exec capability: 5 files (misakanet/guard.py, misakanet/profile.py, misakanet/scripts/clean_pipeline.py, +2 more) discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: 5 files (misakanet/cli/heal.py, misakanet/profile.py, misakanet/scripts/draft_reminder.py, +2 more) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.

• Version behavior

  fail10% of grade

  Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

  vs prior 2.12.2 (minor bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: fs-write, http-client, net, subprocess; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): 127.0.0.1, api.github.com, api.llm.internal-gateway.cn, commoncrawl.org, example.test, github.com, misakanet.org, openai.com, proxy.corp.com, pypi.tuna.tsinghua.edu.cn, test, user, www.bing.com, www.google.com, yandex.com.

• Transport config

  warn10% of grade

  Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

  manifest/source references tracking behavior — disclosure