2 checks that ran failed — supply chain and version behavior — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.
- Publisher
- io.github.L337-org
- Repository
- github.com/L337-org/docker-mcp
- Install
- pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.1.2, pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.1.3, pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.1.4, pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.2.0, pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.2.1, pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.2.2, pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.2.3, pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.2.4, pypi:docker-mcp-server, oci:ghcr.io/l337-org/docker-mcp-server:2.2.5
- Versions
- 9
- Inspected
- 5 of 6 checks · 75%
- Scored
- 2026-09-04 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
fail25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
Python build script executes at build time: network call in build script
Credential hygiene
pass15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. docker_mcp/_env.py) — the recommended intake shape. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.
Permission scope
warn15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
references credential paths: docker_mcp/tools/_ssh_proxy.py: references a credential path (/.ssh/) has both shell/exec and network egress — capable of download-and-run, though no such path was observed (docker_mcp/tools/_cli.py: subprocess.* call; docker_mcp/tools/_ssh_proxy.py: outbound HTTP/socket call). discloses shell/exec capability: docker_mcp/tools/_cli.py: subprocess.* call Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.
Version behavior
fail10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
vs prior 2.2.4 (patch bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: http-client, net, subprocess; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): 127.0.0.1, 169.254.169.254, auth.docker.io, auth.evil.com, auth.example.com, distribution.github.io, docker-py.readthedocs.io, docs.docker.com, example.com, github.com, hub.docker.com, nodejs.org.
Transport config
warn10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
manifest/source references usage stats behavior — disclosure
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v2.2.5 · current | 2026-08-18 | D | 52.5 | 5/6 · 75% | B→D in v2.2.5 |
| v2.2.4 | 2026-08-14 | B | 75 | 3/6 · 55% | C→B in v2.2.4 |
| v2.2.3 | 2026-08-10 | C | 62.5 | 5/6 · 75% | ±0 |
| v2.2.2 | 2026-07-31 | C | 62.5 | 5/6 · 75% | ±0 |
| v2.2.1 | 2026-07-28 | C | 62.5 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v2.1.4 | 2026-07-18 | C | 62.5 | 4/6 · 65% | — |