io.github.Mibayy/token-savior

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

• Injection surface

  unscannable25% of grade

  Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

  No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.

• Supply chain

  pass25% of grade

  Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

  repository linkage verified

• Credential hygiene

  warn15% of grade

  How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

  tests/test_config_analyzer.py: embeds a PRIVATE KEY block. (in an example/sample file — lower severity, but a real key here still leaks.) Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. src/token_savior/dashboard.py) — the recommended intake shape.

• Permission scope

  fail15% of grade

  Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

  HIGH: shell/exec capability AND destructive filesystem writes together (src/token_savior/breaking_changes.py: subprocess.* call; src/token_savior/checkpoint_ops.py: destructive filesystem call (shutil.rmtree/os.remove/etc.)). discloses shell/exec capability: src/token_savior/breaking_changes.py: subprocess.* call discloses shell/exec capability: src/token_savior/git_tracker.py: subprocess.* call discloses shell/exec capability: src/token_savior/impacted_tests.py: subprocess.* call discloses shell/exec capability: src/token_savior/project_actions.py: subprocess.* call discloses shell/exec capability: tests/test_breaking_changes.py: subprocess.* call discloses shell/exec capability: tests/test_incremental.py: subprocess.* call discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: src/token_savior/checkpoint_ops.py: destructive filesystem call (shutil.rmtree/os.remove/etc.) discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: src/token_savior/project_indexer.py: path traversal ('../') combined with file access discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: src/token_savior/server.py: open(…, 'w'/'a'/'x') write-mode file access discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: src/token_savior/server.py: destructive filesystem call (shutil.rmtree/os.remove/etc.) discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: tests/test_breaking_changes.py: open(…, 'w'/'a'/'x') write-mode file access discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: tests/test_breaking_changes.py: destructive filesystem call (shutil.rmtree/os.remove/etc.) discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: tests/test_project_indexer.py: open(…, 'w'/'a'/'x') write-mode file access Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.

• Version behavior

  unscannable10% of grade

  Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

  no prior version to diff (first sight of io.github.Mibayy/[email protected]); version-drift / rug-pull cannot be evaluated. Cold-start risk is covered by point-in-time checks (injection_surface, supply_chain, credential_hygiene), not here.

• Transport config

  warn10% of grade

  Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

  manifest/source references tracking behavior — disclosure