2 checks that ran failed — supply chain and version behavior — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.
- Publisher
- io.github.Opita-Code
- Repository
- github.com/Opita-Code/dark-memory-mcp
- Install
- npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp, npm:@opitacode/dark-memory-mcp
- Versions
- 17
- Inspected
- 4 of 6 checks · 65%
- Scored
- 2026-09-02 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
fail25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
install hook "postinstall" contains inline code eval
Credential hygiene
pass15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
No hardcoded secrets, secret-shaped tool parameters, or leaked keys found. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.
Permission scope
warn15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
discloses shell/exec capability: index.js: imports child_process and calls exec/spawn Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.
Version behavior
fail10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
vs prior 2.19.1 (minor bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: child_process; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): github.com.
Transport config
unscannable10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
local stdio server: no remote transport or auth surface, and no phone-home/telemetry signal found in source. Absence of transport findings is NOT a safety guarantee — phone-home hosts can be constructed at runtime and defeat static analysis.
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v2.20.0 · current | 2026-08-21 | D | 57.5 | 4/6 · 65% | B→D in v2.20.0 |
| v2.19.1 | 2026-08-18 | B | 75 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v2.13.0 | 2026-08-10 | B | 75 | 3/6 · 55% | C→B in v2.13.0 |
| v2.12.0 | 2026-08-08 | C | 67.5 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v2.11.1-alpha | 2026-08-05 | C | 67.5 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v2.11.0 | 2026-08-04 | C | 67.5 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v2.9.3-alpha | 2026-08-03 | C | 67.5 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v2.8.0-alpha | 2026-07-29 | C | 67.5 | 3/6 · 55% | ±0 |
| v2.11.1 | 2026-08-08 | C | 67.5 | 3/6 · 55% | — |