MCP server · trust report

io.github.UnboundCompute/lachesis

2 checks that ran failed — supply chain and version behavior — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.

Publisher
io.github.UnboundCompute
Repository
github.com/UnboundCompute/lachesis
Install
pypi:lachesis-cpg, pypi:lachesis-cpg, pypi:lachesis-cpg, pypi:lachesis-cpg, pypi:lachesis-cpg
Versions
5
Inspected
4 of 6 checks · 65%
Scored
2026-09-02 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks1 clean3 flagged2 not inspected
  • Injection surface

    unscannable25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.

  • Supply chain

    fail25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    Python build script executes at build time: subprocess in build script

  • Credential hygiene

    pass15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. lachesis/cache.py) — the recommended intake shape. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

  • Permission scope

    warn15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    has both shell/exec and network egress — capable of download-and-run, though no such path was observed (lachesis/checks.py: subprocess.* call; lachesis/frontends/checks.py: outbound HTTP/socket call). has both shell/exec and destructive filesystem writes (lachesis/checks.py: subprocess.* call; lachesis/cache.py: open(…, 'w'/'a'/'x') write-mode file access). discloses shell/exec capability: 8 files (lachesis/checks.py, lachesis/cli/doctor.py, lachesis/core/runner.py, +5 more) discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: 16 files (lachesis/cache.py, lachesis/cache.py, lachesis/cli/indexer.py, +13 more) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.

  • Version behavior

    fail10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    vs prior 0.2.0 (minor bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: child_process, dynamic-eval, fs-write, http-client, subprocess; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): example.test, github.com, nodejs.org, registry.npmjs.org, sh.rustup.rs.

  • Transport config

    unscannable10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    local stdio server: no remote transport or auth surface, and no phone-home/telemetry signal found in source. Absence of transport findings is NOT a safety guarantee — phone-home hosts can be constructed at runtime and defeat static analysis.

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v0.4.1 · current2026-08-28 D57.54/6 · 65%B→D in v0.4.1
v0.2.02026-08-24 B754/6 · 65%±0
v0.1.72026-08-22 B1004/6 · 65%±0
v0.1.62026-08-21 B1003/6 · 55%