2 checks that ran failed — supply chain and version behavior — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.
- Publisher
- io.github.brunovicco
- Repository
- github.com/brunovicco/openfinance-br-mcp
- Install
- pypi:openfinance-br-mcp, pypi:openfinance-br-mcp
- Versions
- 2
- Inspected
- 5 of 6 checks · 75%
- Scored
- 2026-09-01 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
fail25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
Python build script executes at build time: network call in build script
Credential hygiene
pass15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
No hardcoded secrets, secret-shaped tool parameters, or leaked keys found. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.
Permission scope
pass15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
Network egress present (src/openfinance_br_mcp/context.py: outbound HTTP/socket call) — expected for most servers and not a finding on its own. No shell-exec, unbounded/sensitive filesystem, or download-and-run primitives found in scanned source. PASS = no static red flag. Static scanning is blind to code fetched or executed at runtime.
Version behavior
fail10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
vs prior 0.1.0 (minor bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: http-client; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): ..., api.banco.com.br, api.bradesco.com, api.caixa.gov.br, api.mais.ob.btgpactual.com, api.nubank.com.br, api.sicoob.com.br, bank.example, bank.example.com, cloud.langfuse.com, customerdata-mtls.of.bb.com.br, data.directory.openbankingbrasil.org.br, data.sandbox.directory.openbankingbrasil.org.br, example.com, github.com, idp.example.com, impostor-idp.example.com, impostor.example.com, matls-banking-openfinance.xpi.com.br, matls-open.btgmais.com, mcp.example.com, oauth-mtls.of.bb.com.br, oauth2.opf.itau, oidc-mtls.openbanking.picpay.com, openbanking.api.nubank.com.br, openbanking.api.santander.com.br, openfinancebrasil.atlassian.net, resolved.example.com, resources-mtls.openbanking.picpay.com, secure.opf.api.itau, some-other-server.example.com, tempo.example.com, token.example.com, trust-openbanking.api.santander.com.br, unused.example.com, us.cloud.langfuse.com, x, x.com, your-domain.com, your-idp.example.com, your-mcp-server.example.com.
Transport config
warn10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
manifest/source references Tracking behavior — disclosure
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v0.2.0 · current | 2026-07-17 | C | 60 | 5/6 · 75% | B→C in v0.2.0 |
| v0.1.0 | 2026-07-14 | B | 75 | 3/6 · 55% | — |