Passes 0 checks with a soft flag on supply chain, credential hygiene, permission scope and transport config — worth a look, not a dealbreaker.
- Publisher
- io.github.eghuzefa
- Repository
- —
- Install
- pypi:engineer-your-data, pypi:engineer-your-data, pypi:engineer-your-data, pypi:engineer-your-data
- Versions
- 4
- Inspected
- 4 of 6 checks · 65%
- Scored
- 2026-07-20 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
warn25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
no resolvable repository linked to the package (provenance unverifiable)
Credential hygiene
warn15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
tests/tools/test_api_client.py: contains a hardcoded JWT (eyJ0…gQ (len 149)) — in an example/sample file; verify it is not a real key. Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. src/server.py) — the recommended intake shape.
Permission scope
warn15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: tests/tools/test_file_operations.py: open(…, 'w'/'a'/'x') write-mode file access discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: tests/tools/test_file_operations.py: destructive filesystem call (shutil.rmtree/os.remove/etc.) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.
Version behavior
unscannable10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
no prior version to diff (first sight of io.github.eghuzefa/[email protected]); version-drift / rug-pull cannot be evaluated. Cold-start risk is covered by point-in-time checks (injection_surface, supply_chain, credential_hygiene), not here.
Transport config
warn10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
manifest/source references analytics behavior — disclosure
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v0.1.3 · current | 2025-09-30 | C | 67.5 | 4/6 · 65% | insf→C in v0.1.3 |
| v0.1.0 | 2025-09-29 | insufficient | — | 1/6 · 25% | — |