MCP server · trust report

io.github.equinoxaifinance-rgb/civicdataforge

Clean across every one of the 5 checks that ran, but only 75% of the server could be inspected — so an A isn’t earned yet and the grade is held at B.

Publisher
io.github.equinoxaifinance-rgb
Repository
github.com/equinoxaifinance-rgb/civicdataforge-mcp
Install
remote only
Versions
8
MCP revision
2025-11-25 · superseded
Inspected
5 of 6 checks · 75%
Scored
2026-08-31 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks5 clean1 not inspected
  • Injection surface

    unscannable25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.

  • Supply chain

    pass25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    repository linkage verified

  • Credential hygiene

    pass15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    No hardcoded secrets, secret-shaped tool parameters, or leaked keys found. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

  • Permission scope

    pass15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    No shell-exec, unbounded/sensitive filesystem, or download-and-run primitives found in scanned source. PASS = no static red flag. Static scanning is blind to code fetched or executed at runtime.

  • Version behavior

    pass10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    tool surface, capabilities, install scripts, and publisher unchanged vs prior version 1.4.0 (patch bump); no rug-pull drift.

  • Transport config

    pass10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    remote endpoint "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=civicdataforge/leie-exclusion-screening,civicdataforge/str-permit-registry,civicdataforge/texas-childcare-licensing,civicdataforge/nyc-film-permits" uses TLS (https); remote endpoint "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=civicdataforge/str-permit-registry,civicdataforge/fl-dbpr-vacation-rentals,civicdataforge/property-violations,civicdataforge/leie-exclusion-screening,civicdataforge/restaurant-inspection-scores,civicdataforge/multistate-childcare-licensing,civicdataforge/texas-childcare-licensing" uses TLS (https); remote endpoint "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=civicdataforge/civicdataforge-evidence-gateway,civicdataforge/str-permit-registry,civicdataforge/fl-dbpr-vacation-rentals,civicdataforge/property-violations,civicdataforge/leie-exclusion-screening,civicdataforge/restaurant-inspection-scores,civicdataforge/multistate-childcare-licensing,civicdataforge/texas-childcare-licensing,civicdataforge/epa-echo-facility-compliance" uses TLS (https); remote endpoint "https://mcp.apify.com/?tools=civicdataforge/civicdataforge-evidence-gateway,civicdataforge/str-permit-registry,civicdataforge/fl-dbpr-vacation-rentals,civicdataforge/property-violations,civicdataforge/leie-exclusion-screening,civicdataforge/restaurant-inspection-scores,civicdataforge/multistate-childcare-licensing,civicdataforge/texas-childcare-licensing,civicdataforge/epa-echo-facility-compliance,civicdataforge/norway-company-evidence" uses TLS (https); remote endpoint "https://civicdataforge.pages.dev/mcp" uses TLS (https); remote endpoint uses OAuth (strongest auth mode)

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v1.4.1 · current2026-08-26 B1005/6 · 75%±0
v1.4.02026-08-24 B1005/6 · 75%±0
v1.1.02026-08-21 B1005/6 · 75%insf→B in v1.1.0
v1.0.02026-08-11 insufficient2/6 · 35%