MCP server · trust report

io.github.ghost-in-the-droid/android-agent

Passes 2 checks with a soft flag on permission scope and transport config — worth a look, not a dealbreaker.

Publisher
io.github.ghost-in-the-droid
Repository
github.com/ghost-in-the-droid/android-agent
Install
pypi:ghost-in-the-droid
Versions
1
Inspected
4 of 6 checks · 65%
Scored
2026-09-02 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks2 clean2 flagged2 not inspected
  • Injection surface

    unscannable25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.

  • Supply chain

    pass25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    Python build script has no build-time network/exec; repository linkage verified

  • Credential hygiene

    pass15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. gitd/app.py) — the recommended intake shape. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

  • Permission scope

    warn15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    has both shell/exec and network egress — capable of download-and-run, though no such path was observed (gitd/benchmarks/ghost_bench/evaluators.py: subprocess.* call; gitd/benchmarks/runner.py: outbound HTTP/socket call). has both shell/exec and destructive filesystem writes (gitd/benchmarks/ghost_bench/evaluators.py: subprocess.* call; gitd/bots/common/ios.py: open(…, 'w'/'a'/'x') write-mode file access). discloses shell/exec capability: 27 files (gitd/benchmarks/ghost_bench/evaluators.py, gitd/bots/common/adb.py, gitd/bots/common/ios.py, +24 more) discloses dynamic code execution: gitd/cli.py: uses eval()/exec() discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: 7 files (gitd/bots/common/ios.py, gitd/cli.py, gitd/routers/creator.py, +4 more) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.

  • Version behavior

    unscannable10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    no prior version to diff (first sight of io.github.ghost-in-the-droid/[email protected]); version-drift / rug-pull cannot be evaluated. Cold-start risk is covered by point-in-time checks (injection_surface, supply_chain, credential_hygiene), not here.

  • Transport config

    warn10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    sends telemetry to third-party SDK (google-analytics) — disclosure, verify opt-in; manifest/source references analytics behavior — disclosure

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v1.3.2 · current2026-07-19 B87.54/6 · 65%