io.github.helpmyagent/helpmyagent

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

• Injection surface

  pass25% of grade

  Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

  Scanned 335 text field(s); no instruction-injection patterns found. PASS = no static red flag. A server can serve different tool descriptions at runtime (the rug-pull class), which static scanning cannot see.

• Supply chain

  warn25% of grade

  Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

  no resolvable repository linked to the package (provenance unverifiable)

• Credential hygiene

  pass15% of grade

  How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

  No hardcoded secrets, secret-shaped tool parameters, or leaked keys found. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

• Permission scope

  unscannable15% of grade

  Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

  No source files, package.json, or pyproject were fetched; cannot infer capability scope.

• Version behavior

  fail10% of grade

  Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

  vs prior 1.5.8 (patch bump): tool "search_apis" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "describe_api" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "list_categories" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_aids" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_certifications" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_compliance" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_directors" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_events" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_financials" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_intelligence" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_opportunities" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_profile" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_public_contracts" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_risk" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_search" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_signals" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "company_fr_verify" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); tool "procurement_fr_search" description changed (wording only, no injection pattern); new tool "company_fr_benchmark" appeared; new tool "company_fr_compare" appeared; new tool "company_fr_competitors" appeared; new tool "company_fr_default_score" appeared; new tool "company_fr_director_mandates" appeared; new tool "company_fr_e_invoice" appeared; new tool "company_fr_industrial_risk" appeared; new tool "company_fr_invoice_check" appeared; new tool "company_fr_kyb" appeared; new tool "company_fr_kyb_batch" appeared; new tool "company_fr_legal_announcements_search" appeared; new tool "company_fr_legal_announcements_since" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "company_fr_lobbying" appeared; new tool "company_fr_nearby" appeared; new tool "company_fr_payment_context" appeared; new tool "company_fr_peers" appeared; new tool "company_fr_prospecting" appeared; new tool "company_fr_public_contract_competitors" appeared; new tool "company_fr_public_contracts_eu" appeared; new tool "company_fr_regulator_alerts" appeared; new tool "company_fr_regulatory_approvals" appeared; new tool "company_fr_report" appeared; new tool "company_fr_risk_reading" appeared; new tool "company_fr_sector_statistics" appeared; new tool "company_fr_supplier_verification" appeared; new tool "compliance_name_screen" appeared; new tool "iban_validate" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "procurement_fr_buyer_profile" appeared; new tool "procurement_fr_deadlines" appeared; new tool "vat_eu_validate" appeared.

• Transport config

  fail10% of grade

  Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

  remote MCP endpoint declares NO authentication (unauthenticated remote — nginx-ui/CVE-2026-33032 class)