MCP server · trust report

io.github.kapella-hub/firekeep

2 checks that ran failed — version behavior and transport config — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.

Publisher
io.github.kapella-hub
Repository
github.com/kapella-hub/FirekeepHQ
Install
pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client, pypi:firekeep-client
Versions
17
Inspected
5 of 6 checks · 75%
Scored
2026-09-04 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks2 clean3 flagged1 not inspected
  • Injection surface

    unscannable25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.

  • Supply chain

    pass25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    repository linkage verified

  • Credential hygiene

    pass15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. firekeep_client/adapters/claude_desktop.py) — the recommended intake shape. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

  • Permission scope

    warn15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    has both shell/exec and network egress — capable of download-and-run, though no such path was observed (firekeep_client/adapters/kiro.py: subprocess.* call; firekeep_client/connect.py: outbound HTTP/socket call). has both shell/exec and destructive filesystem writes (firekeep_client/adapters/kiro.py: subprocess.* call; firekeep_client/backups.py: destructive filesystem call (shutil.rmtree/os.remove/etc.)). discloses shell/exec capability: 16 files (firekeep_client/adapters/kiro.py, firekeep_client/autoupdate.py, firekeep_client/cli.py, +13 more) discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: 10 files (firekeep_client/backups.py, firekeep_client/cli.py, firekeep_client/config_write.py, +7 more) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.

  • Version behavior

    fail10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    vs prior 1.6.0 (patch bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: child_process, fs-write, http-client, net, subprocess; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): ..., 10.0.0.5, 127.0.0.1, 198.51.100.7, agent-plugins.org, alice, already.example, attacker.example, auth.example, cortex-api, dist.example, evil.example, example.invalid, firekeep.ai, firekeep.corp, firekeep.corp.example, firekeep.example, firekeep.office.example, fk.example, github.com, gl, h, internal.example, jedisct1.github.io, kapella-hub.github.io, mock, ollama, opencode.ai, pi.dev, plain.example, reg.example, registry.modelcontextprotocol.io, relay, releases.example, sentinel, symdex, upstream, x, your.

  • Transport config

    fail10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    source performs runtime self-update / download-and-execute (bypasses version_behavior); manifest/source references heartbeat behavior — disclosure

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v1.6.1 · current2026-09-03 C72.55/6 · 75%±0
v1.6.02026-09-02 C72.55/6 · 75%±0
v1.5.82026-08-31 C72.55/6 · 75%±0
v1.5.72026-08-29 C72.55/6 · 75%±0
v1.5.52026-08-27 C72.55/6 · 75%±0
v1.5.42026-08-26 C72.55/6 · 75%±0
v1.5.22026-08-21 C72.55/6 · 75%B→C in v1.5.2
v1.4.22026-08-20 B82.55/6 · 75%±0
v1.0.32026-08-19 B82.55/6 · 75%C→B in v1.0.3
v1.0.22026-08-18 C72.55/6 · 75%B→C in v1.0.2
v0.1.432026-08-13 B82.54/6 · 65%