3 checks that ran failed — supply chain, version behavior and transport config — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.
- Publisher
- io.github.n24q02m
- Install
- pypi:better-code-review-graph, oci:docker.io/n24q02m/better-code-review-graph:latest, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph
- Versions
- 45
- Inspected
- 5 of 6 checks · 75%
- Scored
- 2026-09-03 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
fail25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
Python build script executes at build time: network call in build script
Credential hygiene
warn15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
tests/test_embeddings.py: assigns a literal to api_key (expl…ey (len 12)) — non-provider secret literal; prefer environment intake. Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. hooks/stale-graph-check.py) — the recommended intake shape.
Permission scope
warn15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
has both shell/exec and network egress — capable of download-and-run, though no such path was observed (hooks/branch-sync-check.py: subprocess.* call; src/better_code_review_graph/relay_setup.py: outbound HTTP/socket call). discloses shell/exec capability: 6 files (hooks/branch-sync-check.py, scripts/preserve-diacritics.py, src/better_code_review_graph/federation.py, +3 more) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.
Version behavior
fail10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
vs prior 3.23.0 (minor bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: dynamic-eval, http-client, subprocess; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): 127.0.0.1, aistudio.google.com, better-code-review-graph.n24q02m.dev, cloud.google.com, crg.example, crg.example.com, crg.example.test, dashboard.cohere.com, docs.cohere.com, env-embed, env-llm, example.com, gateway.example, github.com, graphml.graphdrawing.org, gw-a, gw-b, jina.ai, json.schemastore.org, maven.apache.org, platform.openai.com, proxy.example, relay.example.com.
Transport config
fail10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
source performs runtime self-update / download-and-execute (bypasses version_behavior); manifest/source references tracking behavior — disclosure
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v3.24.0 · current | 2026-09-02 | D | 40 | 5/6 · 75% | B→D in v3.24.0 |
| v3.23.0 | 2026-08-31 | B | 75 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v3.21.0 | 2026-07-18 | B | 75 | 3/6 · 55% | ±0 |
| v3.20.0 | 2026-07-14 | B | 75 | 3/6 · 55% | ±0 |
| v3.17.0 | 2026-06-07 | B | 75 | 3/6 · 55% | D→B in v3.17.0 |
| v3.9.2 | 2026-04-17 | D | 50 | 4/6 · 65% | B→D in v3.9.2 |
| v1.0.3 | 2026-03-20 | B | 75 | 3/6 · 55% | — |