MCP server · trust report

io.github.n24q02m/better-code-review-graph

3 checks that ran failed — supply chain, version behavior and transport config — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.

Publisher
io.github.n24q02m
Repository
github.com/n24q02m/better-code-review-graph.git
Install
pypi:better-code-review-graph, oci:docker.io/n24q02m/better-code-review-graph:latest, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph, pypi:better-code-review-graph
Versions
45
Inspected
5 of 6 checks · 75%
Scored
2026-09-03 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks0 clean5 flagged1 not inspected
  • Injection surface

    unscannable25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.

  • Supply chain

    fail25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    Python build script executes at build time: network call in build script

  • Credential hygiene

    warn15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    tests/test_embeddings.py: assigns a literal to api_key (expl…ey (len 12)) — non-provider secret literal; prefer environment intake. Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. hooks/stale-graph-check.py) — the recommended intake shape.

  • Permission scope

    warn15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    has both shell/exec and network egress — capable of download-and-run, though no such path was observed (hooks/branch-sync-check.py: subprocess.* call; src/better_code_review_graph/relay_setup.py: outbound HTTP/socket call). discloses shell/exec capability: 6 files (hooks/branch-sync-check.py, scripts/preserve-diacritics.py, src/better_code_review_graph/federation.py, +3 more) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.

  • Version behavior

    fail10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    vs prior 3.23.0 (minor bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: dynamic-eval, http-client, subprocess; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): 127.0.0.1, aistudio.google.com, better-code-review-graph.n24q02m.dev, cloud.google.com, crg.example, crg.example.com, crg.example.test, dashboard.cohere.com, docs.cohere.com, env-embed, env-llm, example.com, gateway.example, github.com, graphml.graphdrawing.org, gw-a, gw-b, jina.ai, json.schemastore.org, maven.apache.org, platform.openai.com, proxy.example, relay.example.com.

  • Transport config

    fail10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    source performs runtime self-update / download-and-execute (bypasses version_behavior); manifest/source references tracking behavior — disclosure

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v3.24.0 · current2026-09-02 D405/6 · 75%B→D in v3.24.0
v3.23.02026-08-31 B754/6 · 65%±0
v3.21.02026-07-18 B753/6 · 55%±0
v3.20.02026-07-14 B753/6 · 55%±0
v3.17.02026-06-07 B753/6 · 55%D→B in v3.17.0
v3.9.22026-04-17 D504/6 · 65%B→D in v3.9.2
v1.0.32026-03-20 B753/6 · 55%