MCP server · trust report

io.github.navapbc/rebar

4 checks that ran failed — supply chain, permission scope, version behavior and transport config — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.

Publisher
io.github.navapbc
Repository
github.com/navapbc/rebar
Install
pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar
Versions
18
Inspected
5 of 6 checks · 75%
Scored
2026-09-03 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks1 clean4 flagged1 not inspected
  • Injection surface

    unscannable25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.

  • Supply chain

    fail25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    Python build script executes at build time: subprocess in build script

  • Credential hygiene

    pass15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. src/rebar/config.py) — the recommended intake shape. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

  • Permission scope

    fail15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    HIGH: executes content derived from a network response (src/rebar/_engine/ticket_graph/_links.py: passes a network response into an exec/eval call). has both shell/exec and destructive filesystem writes (src/rebar/__init__.py: subprocess.* call; src/rebar/_engine/acli-integration.py: destructive filesystem call (shutil.rmtree/os.remove/etc.)). discloses shell/exec capability: 24 files (src/rebar/__init__.py, src/rebar/_engine.py, src/rebar/cli.py, +21 more) discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: 21 files (src/rebar/_engine/acli-integration.py, src/rebar/_engine/ticket-archive-markers-backfill.sh, src/rebar/_engine/ticket-compact.sh, +18 more) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.

  • Version behavior

    fail10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    vs prior 0.12.0 (minor bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: fs-write, http-client, subprocess; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): example, example.atlassian.net, example.com, github.com, id.atlassian.com, jira.example.com, navasage.atlassian.net, support.atlassian.com, test.atlassian.net, x, your-org.atlassian.net.

  • Transport config

    fail10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    source performs runtime self-update / download-and-execute (bypasses version_behavior); manifest/source references Tracking behavior — disclosure

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v0.13.1 · current2026-08-30 D405/6 · 75%B→D in v0.13.1
v0.12.02026-08-16 B754/6 · 65%±0
v0.11.02026-08-07 B753/6 · 55%D→B in v0.11.0
v0.10.12026-07-24 D455/6 · 75%±0
v0.10.02026-07-23 D555/6 · 75%±0
v0.9.12026-07-20 D554/6 · 65%C→D in v0.9.1
v0.8.02026-07-16 C704/6 · 65%