4 checks that ran failed — supply chain, permission scope, version behavior and transport config — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.
- Publisher
- io.github.navapbc
- Repository
- github.com/navapbc/rebar
- Install
- pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar, pypi:nava-rebar
- Versions
- 18
- Inspected
- 5 of 6 checks · 75%
- Scored
- 2026-09-03 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
fail25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
Python build script executes at build time: subprocess in build script
Credential hygiene
pass15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
Reads secrets from the environment (e.g. src/rebar/config.py) — the recommended intake shape. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.
Permission scope
fail15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
HIGH: executes content derived from a network response (src/rebar/_engine/ticket_graph/_links.py: passes a network response into an exec/eval call). has both shell/exec and destructive filesystem writes (src/rebar/__init__.py: subprocess.* call; src/rebar/_engine/acli-integration.py: destructive filesystem call (shutil.rmtree/os.remove/etc.)). discloses shell/exec capability: 24 files (src/rebar/__init__.py, src/rebar/_engine.py, src/rebar/cli.py, +21 more) discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: 21 files (src/rebar/_engine/acli-integration.py, src/rebar/_engine/ticket-archive-markers-backfill.sh, src/rebar/_engine/ticket-compact.sh, +18 more) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.
Version behavior
fail10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
vs prior 0.12.0 (minor bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: fs-write, http-client, subprocess; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): example, example.atlassian.net, example.com, github.com, id.atlassian.com, jira.example.com, navasage.atlassian.net, support.atlassian.com, test.atlassian.net, x, your-org.atlassian.net.
Transport config
fail10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
source performs runtime self-update / download-and-execute (bypasses version_behavior); manifest/source references Tracking behavior — disclosure
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v0.13.1 · current | 2026-08-30 | D | 40 | 5/6 · 75% | B→D in v0.13.1 |
| v0.12.0 | 2026-08-16 | B | 75 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v0.11.0 | 2026-08-07 | B | 75 | 3/6 · 55% | D→B in v0.11.0 |
| v0.10.1 | 2026-07-24 | D | 45 | 5/6 · 75% | ±0 |
| v0.10.0 | 2026-07-23 | D | 55 | 5/6 · 75% | ±0 |
| v0.9.1 | 2026-07-20 | D | 55 | 4/6 · 65% | C→D in v0.9.1 |
| v0.8.0 | 2026-07-16 | C | 70 | 4/6 · 65% | — |