1 check that ran failed — version behavior — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.
- Publisher
- io.github.rigour-labs
- Repository
- github.com/rigour-labs/rigour
- Install
- npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp, npm:@rigour-labs/mcp
- Versions
- 72
- Inspected
- 5 of 6 checks · 75%
- Scored
- 2026-09-02 · rubric 1.0.0
What we checked
Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.
Injection surface
unscannable25% of gradeTool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).
No tool descriptions, server instructions, prompts, or resources were fetched; nothing to scan for injection.
Supply chain
warn25% of gradePackage provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.
package name "@rigour-labs/mcp" is edit-distance 2 from popular package "yup" (typosquat candidate); dependency "yaml" is edit-distance 2 from popular package "yarn" (typosquat candidate); dependency "@rigour-labs/core" is edit-distance 1 from popular package "cors" (typosquat candidate)
Credential hygiene
pass15% of gradeHow the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.
No hardcoded secrets, secret-shaped tool parameters, or leaked keys found. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.
Permission scope
warn15% of gradeDeclared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.
discloses broad/destructive filesystem access: src/index.ts: destructive/writing fs.* call (write/unlink/rm/chmod/rename) Capability DISCLOSURE, not a verdict: static analysis sees the primitive is present and reachable, not whether its use is attacker-controlled.
Version behavior
fail10% of gradeDiff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).
vs prior 5.5.4 (major bump): new capability primitive(s) in source: fs-write; new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): github.com, rigour.run.
Transport config
warn10% of gradeRemote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.
manifest/source references telemetry behavior — disclosure
Version history
Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.
| Version | Published | Grade | Score | Inspected | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v6.0.0 · current | 2026-08-22 | C | 65 | 5/6 · 75% | B→C in v6.0.0 |
| v5.5.4 | 2026-08-11 | B | 87.5 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v5.5.3 | 2026-08-10 | B | 80 | 3/6 · 55% | ±0 |
| v5.5.0 | 2026-08-08 | B | 80 | 4/6 · 65% | C→B in v5.5.0 |
| v5.4.0 | 2026-08-06 | C | 70 | 4/6 · 65% | B→C in v5.4.0 |
| v5.2.9 | 2026-03-18 | B | 75 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v3.0.3 | 2026-02-18 | B | 75 | 4/6 · 65% | ±0 |
| v2.22.0 | 2026-02-17 | B | 87.5 | 3/6 · 55% | — |