io.github.voidmobcom/voidmob-mcp

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

• Injection surface

  pass25% of grade

  Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

  Scanned 136 text field(s); no instruction-injection patterns found. PASS = no static red flag. A server can serve different tool descriptions at runtime (the rug-pull class), which static scanning cannot see.

• Supply chain

  warn25% of grade

  Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

  package name "@voidmob/mcp" is edit-distance 2 from popular package "yup" (typosquat candidate)

• Credential hygiene

  pass15% of grade

  How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

  No hardcoded secrets, secret-shaped tool parameters, or leaked keys found. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

• Permission scope

  pass15% of grade

  Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

  No shell-exec, unbounded/sensitive filesystem, or download-and-run primitives found in scanned source. PASS = no static red flag. Static scanning is blind to code fetched or executed at runtime.

• Version behavior

  fail10% of grade

  Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

  vs prior 1.1.3 (patch bump): new tool "get_account" appeared; new tool "search_sms_services" appeared; new tool "get_rental" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "rent_number" appeared; new tool "cancel_rental" appeared; new tool "reuse_number" appeared; new tool "re_rent_rental" appeared; new tool "toggle_auto_renew" appeared; new tool "search_dedicated_countries" appeared; new tool "purchase_dedicated_number" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "get_dedicated_number" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "search_esim_plans" appeared; new tool "purchase_esim" appeared; new tool "get_esim_status" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "topup_esim" appeared; new tool "get_esim_qr" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "search_proxies" appeared; new tool "purchase_proxy" appeared; new tool "get_proxy_status" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "rotate_proxy_ip" appeared; new tool "renew_proxy" appeared; new tool "topup_proxy" appeared; new tool "regenerate_proxy_password" appeared; new tool "list_proxy_lists" appeared; new tool "create_proxy_list" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "delete_proxy_list" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "get_geo" appeared; new tool "list_orders" appeared.

• Transport config

  unscannable10% of grade

  Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

  local stdio server: no remote transport or auth surface, and no phone-home/telemetry signal found in source. Absence of transport findings is NOT a safety guarantee — phone-home hosts can be constructed at runtime and defeat static analysis.