MCP server · trust report

net.tasklite/mcp

2 checks that ran failed — injection surface and version behavior — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.

Publisher
net.tasklite
Repository
github.com/shimon-ks/tasklite-mcp
Install
npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp, npm:@tasklite/mcp
Versions
14
MCP revision
2025-11-25 · superseded
Inspected
6 of 6 checks · 100%
Scored
2026-09-09 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks3 clean3 flagged
  • Injection surface

    fail25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    server instructions: instruction to hide activity from the user. tool "create_automation" param "actions" description: off-vendor URL in a description (api.frankfurter.app); capability text should not name where data goes. tool "deploy_frontend" description: off-vendor URL in a description ({slug}.tasklite.dev); capability text should not name where data goes. server instructions: off-vendor URL in a description (tasklite.net); capability text should not name where data goes. server instructions: off-vendor URL in a description ({slug}.tasklite.dev); capability text should not name where data goes.

  • Supply chain

    warn25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    package name "@tasklite/mcp" is edit-distance 2 from popular package "yup" (typosquat candidate)

  • Credential hygiene

    pass15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    No hardcoded secrets, secret-shaped tool parameters, or leaked keys found. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

  • Permission scope

    pass15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    No shell-exec, unbounded/sensitive filesystem, or download-and-run primitives found in scanned source. PASS = no static red flag. Static scanning is blind to code fetched or executed at runtime.

  • Version behavior

    fail10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    vs prior 0.13.0 (minor bump): new hardcoded outbound host/BCC destination(s): github.com, tasklite.net.

  • Transport config

    pass10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    remote endpoint "https://mcp.tasklite.net/mcp" uses TLS (https); remote endpoint uses OAuth (strongest auth mode)

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v0.14.1 · current2026-09-09 D52.56/6 · 100%±0
v0.13.02026-09-07 D57.56/6 · 100%C→D in v0.13.0
v0.10.02026-09-06 C62.56/6 · 100%D→C in v0.10.0
v0.8.22026-09-06 D456/6 · 100%±0
v0.5.12026-08-07 D504/6 · 75%—