MCP server · trust report

tools.i-gaming/igaming-data

2 checks that ran failed — version behavior and transport config — so this release can’t be trusted as-is.

Publisher
tools.i-gaming
Repository
Install
remote only
Versions
4
Inspected
5 of 6 checks · 85%
Scored
2026-07-20 · rubric 1.0.0

What we checked

Six static checks, weighted by risk. Every result reflects only what could be observed in the published package and repository — never intent.

6 checks2 clean3 flagged1 not inspected
  • Injection surface

    pass25% of grade

    Tool descriptions/manifest scanned for instruction-injection patterns (imperatives at the model, hidden text, 'ignore previous', data-exfil URLs).

    Scanned 86 text field(s); no instruction-injection patterns found. PASS = no static red flag. A server can serve different tool descriptions at runtime (the rug-pull class), which static scanning cannot see.

  • Supply chain

    warn25% of grade

    Package provenance: namespace verification, repo linkage, maintainer count, account age, postinstall scripts, typosquat distance.

    no resolvable repository linked to the package (provenance unverifiable)

  • Credential hygiene

    pass15% of grade

    How the server takes secrets (env vs plaintext config vs hardcoded); secrets appearing in tool schemas.

    No hardcoded secrets, secret-shaped tool parameters, or leaked keys found. PASS = no static red flag; static analysis cannot prove the code honors env-based secret handling at runtime.

  • Permission scope

    unscannable15% of grade

    Declared tools vs. breadth (filesystem, network, exec); flags shell-exec and unbounded filesystem access.

    No source files, package.json, or pyproject were fetched; cannot infer capability scope.

  • Version behavior

    fail10% of grade

    Diff of tool definitions between versions; new permissions or changed descriptions in a patch release (the postmark-mcp class).

    vs prior 1.0.1 (patch bump): new tool "search_providers" appeared; new tool "get_provider" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "list_provider_slots" appeared; new tool "get_provider_demand" appeared; new tool "search_slots" appeared; new tool "get_slot" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "get_slot_demand" touches a sensitive surface (email/exec/net/fs); new tool "list_news" appeared; new tool "list_jobs" appeared; new tool "list_regulators" appeared; new tool "get_regulator" appeared; new tool "list_sources" appeared.

  • Transport config

    fail10% of grade

    Remote servers: TLS and auth mode (none/token/OAuth). Local servers: whether the manifest indicates it phones home.

    remote MCP endpoint declares NO authentication (unauthenticated remote — nginx-ui/CVE-2026-33032 class)

Version history

Each release plotted by grade against the safe line at B. A version that sinks below the line has lost its trusted standing — the shape of a rug-pull.

VersionPublishedGradeScoreInspectedChange
v1.0.3 · current2026-07-20 C67.55/6 · 85%insf→C in v1.0.3
v1.0.12026-07-18 insufficient1/6 · 25%